Is Luke capable of making a facial expression that isn't stoic? |
You might have noticed that I stopped adding "AKA" in front of every episode title. That's because I decided that it's a pretty dumb gimmick as far as episode titles go. I mean, that, and I forgot to add it. We're not all perfect, okay?
I understand that having Luke get closer and closer to finding the truth about Reva all the while having Jessica look more and more freaked out ramps up the tension for the final reveal. But miscommunication is one of my pet peeves in terms of plot devices -- having a character be in the dark for the sake of conflict feels like lazy storytelling to me, especially when the audience has already been in the know for a while.
I'm not a huge fan of Luke Cage, if you couldn't tell already. When you dislike a character, it's difficult to distinguish whether it's the actor's fault for not playing the role better, or if it's really the writing/directing's fault for holding back the actor and not giving opportunities to show range. I'll admit that I might have been too hard on Krysten Ritter in the past few episodes for this reason. The tepid one-liners and the continuous barrage of sullen looks belies her dynamic acting range, shown in spades this episode as she switches from contempt, to lust, to fear, to remorse with ease and conviction. It might even be a wise move on the part of the writers to characterize Jessica as somewhat dour and unlikeable, only to have her change and develop by the end of the season. Time will only tell.
Unfortunately, I don't think that's the case with Mike Colter. Yes, it's a pretty tall order for any actor to imbue a sense of realism and emotion when you're saying lines like, "You let me be inside you." But there are plenty of other instances where the writers gave Luke an opportunity to be charismatic, and instead, he just comes off as stoic. All. The. Time. The stoicism lends itself well when he's throwing douchebags around like a badass, but not in scenes where he needs to show grief, humor, or affection.
That's partly why I don't buy the "relationship" between Jessica and Luke. I understand that there is a connection there -- they are superpowered beings who can really be with each other physically. But, that's all it is -- physical. Have we seen any evidence for either Luke or Jessica to be attracted to one another for a different reason? Jessica was initially stalking him from the guilt of killing his wife. And then the first night they actually meet in the bar, they have sex. Because they're both hot. Only a few days later do they realize that they both have super strength, another physical perk. Look, there's definitely nothing wrong with a purely physical relationship. I'm perfectly fine if all they do is have sex and fight bad guys together. But when the show tries to make them into something more, I ain't buying it. The cuddling scene was just awkward -- I didn't feel like they earned enough relationship development to earn a scene where they care about each other so much that they're content to simply be in each other's presence. Anyway, your mileage may vary.
Oh Luke. Staring at Jessica after you've just had sex isn't endearing -- it's creepy. Especially if you do it with a really blank expression. |
So, is Jessica Jones, in fact, a piece of shit? In this case, unfortunately, I have to agree with Luke. She's not a terrible person for killing Reva -- both the audience and Luke understand that Kilgrave was ultimately responsible (also, pretty timely for Luke to start believing in Kilgrave). Yes, it's pretty disturbing for Luke knowing that it was Jessica who killed his wife, just like Trish initially had trouble trusting Simpson after he strangled her. What's really got Luke pissed off, though, is that she held this really vital piece of information about his personal life from him, and willingly embarked on a sexual relationship with him while still withholding that knowledge. As cheesy as that "inside you" line was, it does emphasize that he felt violated by Jessica -- and that was her doing, not Kilgrave's.
Kudos to Ritter's acting in this scene |
More of this duo please |
My question is whether or not David Tennant's phenomenal acting as a serial rapist will forever ruin the 10th Doctor for me. |
Other Thoughts:
- Malcolm's question at the survivors group is an interesting one. "It's the question of who I am. He turned me into an addict, a liar, a thief. He did that. But I don't know if it was in me to begin with, or is a part of who I am now?" A question that Jessica, Hope, and all Kilgrave survivors must be struggling with.
- "I know a lot about holding on to shit. It'll only hurt you and everyone around you."
- If Jessica couldn't figure out on her own that Luke was going to kill that bus driver, she's dumber than I thought.
- Even though it's frustrating at times to not fully understand anyone's powers on this show, I kind of like how it shifts the emphasis from the logistics and pseudo-science of powers to the actual effects and consequences of the powers.
- Kilgrave is such a bastard. But it still made me chuckle when he yelled at everyone to be quiet in the cafe.
- Jessica's radio host voice was hilarious and pretty close to Ritter's actual speaking voice.
- "What's a Kilgrave?" Heh.
- I don't know how Pam has put up with the cold and calculated bitch that is Hogarth for so long.
- "Take it down a notch, Jones." Luke is such a condescending turd in the scene with the loan shark henchmen.
- Reva left a message for Luke, telling him where she buried the flash drive. She must have discovered Kilgrave's secret or something. How did she find out? And why not just tell Luke in person?
- "I prefer repression." No shit, Jessica.
- "Wish I had grown up somehwere excessevily normal like this." Perhaps this implies that Kilgrave had a bad upbringing? Still doesn't excuse the fact that he is pure EVIL.
- Luke: "I don't hurt dogs." Heh. I wonder what he did with them then...
- Heehee, I had to laugh when Luke realized Jessica was bailing on him at the warehouse yet again.
No comments:
Post a Comment